QUOTE(Think Systems @ Jan 7 2006, 05:24 PM)

Ah CRAP! He was great, if it wasnt for him I probably wouldnt have faith in the party

See I'm the opposite. I think the Lib Dems are great, but Charles.... not so much. Charles was likeable. Incredibly so, but I think it is hard to see him as PM. Can you see Charles Kennedy commanding the British Armed Forces? Can you see Charles Kennedy lamblasting the opposition across the dispatch box? Because I can't, and those are all things any good leader needs to be able to do. A good leader of a British political party needs to walk the walk, talk the talk and act like a Prime Minister. Charles bumbled (famously being unable to explain his own policy in the Election) Charles drank (hardly a desirable quality in the leader of your nation) and Charles was never up to the oratory standards of Blair or his spiritual son, David Cameron. Charles is a nice guy, and much of his foibles are understandable, and sad. He is very brave for admitting his problem so publically and he did very much for the Lib Dems, but Charles has often been described as a Chairman rather than a leader. I feel that's precisely where he would of been best of, as Party Chairman, working behind the scenes, but for leader 'nice guy down the pub' just doesn't cut it. A political party leader needs to be almost superhuman, and what is often the great thing about Charles is how human he often came across.
As a Lib Dem member I feel the only way we have a hope in hell of gaining seats at the next election is with a leader who comes with the positive aspects of Blair and Cameron with truly Social Liberal viewpoints. For me that man is Simon Hughes, and I will happily place him top of my ballot paper when it arrives.