QUOTE (bfarber @ May 28 2008, 02:36 PM)

Keeping in mind that we have never had any blog documentation, you have to remember the Blog documentation had to be written entirely from the ground up, which is no easy task. Further to that, while the documentation was being written, we began work on 1.4.0 which has new features. From my understanding, the documentation is nearly complete, it just hasn't been delivered yet. We are working on getting it the door ASAP (and we are indeed working on getting documentation for Gallery and Download Manager too, neither of which have any documentation either).
Documentation has been a weak point, but one that we are actively working on correcting.
Thanks for the replies to these points, very much appreciated. I know you are busy.
QUOTE
I will see if Rikki can come up with something.
Thanks (and Rikki!). It will help a lot.
QUOTE
This is a feature we are considering for 2.0. We had time constraints for this release, and we attempted to add as much in as possible, while still retaining stability. Unfortunately this particular feature did not make the cut for 1.4.0, but is still in play for inclusion in the future.
Thanks that's good news and I'm sure it will be a much welcomed addition to the theme tools.
QUOTE
Just as admins do. We will be fleshing out the themes feature over the next few Blog releases, but we wanted to start small, with maximum possible security in mind. If an admin needs to approve every theme submission, it is harder for "bad stuff" to get through than if moderators can approve them, or if the themes can auto-approve in some circumstances.
Still, we have (and continue to) listen to feedback on this and have ideas for the future.
QUOTE
Not a bad idea...though it seems kind of off topic for this thread?
QUOTE
You are not the first person to request this. I am very very much against anyone even remotely considering this option...it becomes a HUGE whole in the security of your website, and it is beyond me why anyone would want to introduce such a whole, whether you trust your members or not (what if one of them got their login info stolen, or used a public computer which kept them logged in, or any other number of possibilities, even if they aren't malicious?).
Nevertheless, I don't run your site.

This is likely to be a feature introduced in the future, regardless of the security or not. The problem then becomes, when people get hacked (and people WILL get hacked if they allow raw CSS through like that), it ends up falling on our shoulders. People won't know how they were hacked, or will blame it on security issues in blog, and so on. It's a catch-22, and it's hard to see any benefit on our part to adding such a feature....
Thanks, I was aware of the security issues with CSS but since you explain it like that obviously not that aware! Well put and totally true.
QUOTE (Keith J. Kacin @ May 28 2008, 02:43 PM)

The bug you linked to is not regarding the upgrader, but rather if you reimport the Pro skin after the blog is installed.
It is the tool in the ACP to rebuild the blog master templates, it does not rebuild the Pro skin.
I can assure you that during QA, the blog was tested to ensure the Pro skin is updated -- and it is.
The lack of documentation was discussed here:
http://forums.invisionpower.com/index.php?showtopic=272160It was an issue we recognized.
Thanks Keith, I'm not sure I understand the reasons behind it, but my board's Blog was affected and Jason has been doing a wonderful job sorting it out.
It now transpires the Gallery was effected too but he's on the job!
QUOTE (Rikki @ May 28 2008, 09:51 PM)

We've uploaded some documentation on the classnames used in the blog skin, so that people can visually find the classname they need in order to style a particular part of the page. You can find it at
http://invisionpower.com/files/blog_theme_guide/ 
Bonus! Thanks for your hard work!