QUOTE (bfarber @ Oct 6 2008, 09:56 AM)

As for the suggestion, I have actually added the feature, but it will ship in the "off" setting as you will need to answer your own questions. If an admin wants to add questions and answers, they will be able to. This is separate from registration profile fields and captcha (you can still use these other features independently if you wish).
QUOTE (Comtech @ Oct 6 2008, 10:17 AM)

Since you have added this feature in, how about the ability to use a captcha and the answer/question method together?
I know some people would like this method. When the competitor added in the ability for questions, a mod was quickly made which allowed the administrator to use both methods together.
My first post probably wasn't clear, but yes you can use both simultaneously. As in, configure questions/answers and use reCAPTCHA both.
QUOTE (Retaliation.SG @ Oct 6 2008, 11:22 AM)

So your solution to spam is another form of CAPTCHA? What's the point? If reCAPTCHA works in the first place, why bother? Not to mention with reCAPTCHA if an exploit is found they can automatically push out an update to your instance.
I think IPB is already providing you with more than enough anti-spam measures. You will *always* have the occasional spammer. It's a fact of life. You already have the latest version of CAPTCHA and custom questions (and apparently custom random questions with IPB3).
Somehow bots were able to mass register and spam on 2.3.5 boards, a ton of people were affected and IPS acted and released 2.3.6 to fix it. Since then I don't see people complaining about the spam, so why are we needing more anti-spam measures?
The fundamental problem to me is the system of CAPTCHA itself. Today's OCR technology is getting better and better. Some computers are quite capable of reading an image and actually practically determining what it is. As technology in image recognition advances, we will reach a point where no amount of tweaking to the CAPTCHA system will do much good. Bots will simply adjust and read the new images.
Thus, I sat down and thought about the question and answer settings and it makes sense.
Say you run a WOW site for your clan. You have a registration question like "What is the weakest class in WOW?" (or something like that - I don't play the game). A bot isn't going to be programed to answer that, but your visitors will know the answer.
Say I run a car forum and add a question "Who makes mustangs?". My visitors will be able to answer this, but again a bot won't be programmed to know the answer.
By allowing administrators to add custom questions, you bypass the whole issue of a bot being able to be programmed to respond. The questions should be unique of course, and the answer shouldn't be contained in the question (though in this case it could be if you wanted). The whole unique-aspect of this approach, combined with the fact that it can be made trivial for humans to answer while still retaining a level of difficulty for an automated program, is what makes this approach ideal to me moving forward.
By the way, you can add as many questions as you want. They randomize on the form. If the user gets it wrong and the form reloads, the question is again pulled at random (thus it's unlikely they'll get the same question twice). You can configure multiple answers for each question, and the answers are case-insensitive.